Is estraverse.replace() return value useful if the method modifies the original in place?
trusktr opened this issue · 0 comments
trusktr commented
I see that estraverse.replace
and estraverse.traverse
return a tree, but it seems to be the same tree that is passed in, so it seems that the original tree is modified in place. Is the return value needed? What if someone doesn't want to modify the original tree, should they copy duplicate the tree in their own way first?