Call for Input: Fix Comment in ERC-3448
SamWilsn opened this issue · 4 comments
SamWilsn commented
Call for Input
| Decision |
Do we merge ethereum/ERCs#429? |
|---|---|
| If Affirmed |
Comment in reference implementation is changed. |
| If Rejected |
ERC-3448 is unchanged. |
| Method |
Rough Consensus |
| Deadline |
July 28, 2024 |
Checklist
I, the opener of this Call for Input, have completed the following:
- Filled in a descriptive title.
- Filled in the "Decision" field.
- Filled in the "If Affirmed" field.
- Filled in the "If Rejected" field.
- Filled in the "Method" field.
- Filled in the "Deadline" field to be thirty days from creation.
- Added any relevant background information (or removed the section.)
- Published a notice in writing to the usual channels frequented by EIP Editors (likely Discord.)
- Commented on this Call for Input, clearly stating my opinion (or abstention.)
SamWilsn commented
I'm in favour of merging, after a quick bytecode scan.
abcoathup commented
Given it is correcting a comment, if the ERC author approves then I'm ok with this, even though I am generally against changing final ERCs. The discussions topic on Eth Magicians should be changed to a wiki post and have a corrections section.
g11tech commented
ok with the change
lightclient commented
seems okay