Call for Input: Editor Removal (@gcolvin)
Closed this issue · 4 comments
Call for Input
| Decision |
Do we remove @gcolvin as an Editor? |
|---|---|
| If Affirmed |
@gcolvin is moved to emeritus and removed from the yaml files. |
| If Rejected |
No change |
| Method |
Unanimous (minus the Editor being removed) |
| Deadline |
December 4, 2024 |
Background
EIPs reviewed in the past year: 2
ERCs reviewed in the past year: 0
Checklist
I, the opener of this Call for Input, have completed the following:
- Filled in a descriptive title.
- Filled in the "Decision" field.
- Filled in the "If Affirmed" field.
- Filled in the "If Rejected" field.
- Filled in the "Method" field.
- Filled in the "Deadline" field to be thirty days from creation.
- Added any relevant background information (or removed the section.)
- Published a notice in writing to the usual channels frequented by EIP Editors (likely Discord.)
- Commented on this Call for Input, clearly stating my opinion (or abstention.)
in favour
Greg has not been active over the past year, so I believe he should be removed from active editor status. That said, I'd support his return in the future.
In favor
If you aren't an active editor (for whatever reason) it is best to step down. My preference is that editors step down themselves.
EIP-1 Emeritus EIP editors is to acknowledge the amazing contribution of past editors.
Plus you can return as an editor.
In favor. Hopefully they are interested in contributing again in the future!
Closing as affirmed.