Project lacks process
Opened this issue · 2 comments
gnidan commented
How will work progress with this effort? How will we know if work is progressing?
Standards groups operate in projects with processes. These processes get documented. Sometimes a meeting schedule exists. This ethdebug project, in its infancy, has none of that yet.
Likely this will also need to include a list of responsible/consulted/etc. parties
chaals commented
I suggest you aim for something like "rough consensus" as a decision-making process. The critical bit then is to work out who decides when there is rough consensus.
chaals commented
Is the decision-making process for merging a PR documented somewhere? That seems important for anyone who wants to contribute but doesn't start out being part of the "in-crowd" ...