EIPIP Meeting 60 Agenda
poojaranjan opened this issue · 5 comments
Date and Time
Wednesday, July 13, 2022, at 14:00 UTC
Location
Zoom: TBA in the Discord #eip-editing channel
YouTube Live Stream/Recording: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4cwHXAawZxpLrRIkDlBjDUUrGgF91pQw
Agenda
0. Travis CI issue. A proposal to migrate to GitHub Actions.
1. Regarding old EIPs that don't conform to current standards. Ref discussion
2. Moving proposal in absence of author. Ref: Comment
3. The future of EIP process after the merge Ref: Comment
4. From GitHub Issue
a. Include a copy of RFC 822 and RFC 2119 in EIP-1's assets folder Ref: Issue
b. EIP-4907 has inconsistencies with Requires (EIP-721), can it be updated? Ref: #156
c. Reference implementations aren't linted prior check-in or when marked as final. Ref: #157
5. License for a reference implementation discussion
6. Past meeting discussion continued
a. One-time NFT Sale of unused EIP numbers Ref: Issue
b. Clarify how to use "ERC" vs. "EIP" to refer to different EIPs
c. Meta EIP for the Executable Spec process for Core EIPs
7. EIPs Insight - Monthly EIPs status reporting.
8. EIP editor apprenticeship meeting
- Meeting 21
9. EIP bots related discussion, updates, agreement on merging PRs & closing Issues.
- eip-bot Issues and Pull Request
- eipv Issues and Pull Request
10. Review action items from the previous meeting
- Pooja will collect feedback regarding one time NFT sale of unused EIP numbers.
- Pooja will talk to the Ethereum Magicians to lower the barrier to entry to create new threads , "discussion-to" template?
- Sam Wilson and Tim Beiko will create a Meta EIP for the Executable Spec process before showing the proposal to the core devs. Remaining EIP editors to give their view on using the executable spec in the EIP process
Next meeting - July 27, 2022
(Anything else, please add a comment)
I'd like to add to agenda:
The future of EIP process after the merge
Would like to add: ethereum/EIPs#5223
@anettrolikova @Pandapip1 items added to agenda.
Proposed discussion EIP template for FEM forum
Closing in favor of #161