EIPIP Meeting 72
poojaranjan opened this issue ยท 7 comments
Date and Time
Jan 11, 2023 at 16:00 UTC
Location
Zoom: TBA in the Discord #eip-editing channel
YouTube Live Stream/Recording: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4cwHXAawZxpLrRIkDlBjDUUrGgF91pQw
Agenda
1. Discuss Open Issues/PRs, and other topics
- What are the prerequisites for someone to be considered a viable reviewer?
- Any documentation/resources
- Process of assigning Peer Reviewer
for community reference?
- Should we make the markdown linter required?
- ethereum/EIPs#5508
- ethereum/EIPs#5270
2. Discussion continued from earlier meetings
3. EIP Bot
TBD
4. EIPs Insight - Monthly EIPs status reporting.
5. EIP Editing Office Hour
Recording Meeting 9
Agenda Meeting 10
6. Review action items from earlier meetings
Prev. meeting [notes 71]
Next meeting - Jan 21 or Jan 25 ?
- Should we make the markdown linter required?
- ethereum/EIPs#5508
- ethereum/EIPs#5270
I might be away from desk today's EIPIP Meeting so putting down some thoughts here.
What are the prerequisites for someone to be considered a viable reviewer?
I think it's great to discuss how could we identify and engage more viable reviewers.
Some thoughts about
- Any documentation/resources: authors of final EIPs would be a great starting point. Also, [the Author Handbook Draft] (https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/5976/files) proposes authors to consider who they(authors) like to invite as their peer reviewers, and use this list as a curated nomination list, i.e "who are wanted as reviewer". @SamWilsn also kept a list of "who wants to review", we can start with the intersection of these two set.
- Process of assigning Peer Reviewer for community reference? This is a great question to think, I don't have a good answer to this,. What I do feel we could also do more is to begin with promoting the idea of "peer reviewer" and let more authors and important ecosystem stakeholders step-in to contribute to reviewing. Maybe a periodic recurring author's meetup and/or peer reviewer's meetup would be something worth trying?
Support. I think it's a great idea to upgrade EIP-Bot to eip-review-bot. Let me know if there is any help you need. @SamWilsn and @Pandapip1
Moving the meeting to Jan 11, 2023 due to less participation.
- ethereum/EIPs#6306: Proposal under EIP-5757 to add new external sources.
Decisions from today's meeting
- Add "Peer Reviewer" item to the next meeting for @SamWilsn to explain
- Present participants are okay to merge PR-5508
- @xinbenlv wants to provide an opportunity to @SamWilsn to discuss PR - 5270 in the next meeting.
- Rough consensus is to not make big changes to popularly adopted EIPs as prominent as EIP-20. @lightclients will add comment to the PR-6038 and close.
- Bring PR-6269 to the next meeting if still open.
- PR-6306 @lightclient is okay with adding execution specs but not the Yellow Paper.
- Next meeting - Jan 25 at 16:00 UTC.
thank you for the effort
Closing in favor of #208