EIPIP Meeting 81
poojaranjan opened this issue · 7 comments
Date and Time
May 17, 2023 at 14:00 UTC
Location
Zoom: TBA in the Discord #eip-editing channel
YouTube Live Stream/Recording: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4cwHXAawZxpLrRIkDlBjDUUrGgF91pQw
Agenda
1. Discuss Open Issues/PRs, and other topics
Edit to Final EIP
2. Discussion continued or updates from past meetings
- Progress on EIP number bot
3. EIPs Insight - Monthly EIPs status reporting.
4. EIP Editing Office Hour
5. Review action items from earlier meetings
- Prev. meeting Summary
Next meeting - May 31, 2023?
Unfortunately, I won't be able to make the call.
Re: EIP-6953, I have a weak preference to get it to Final over Living, and if we ever change the hard fork activation mechanism again (I hope not!!), I'll create a new EIP to supersede this one. My goal isn't to have the EIP be a list of every hard fork activated on mainnet, but to show the various activation mechanisms over time, so it's fine if the last one says something like "these forks were activated using epoch + timestamps, and we expect all future ones to do so as well". I can edit the EIP to reflect this.
That said, I'm not opposed to "Living" either, if editors feel it's best. If that were the case, then I think we should maintain the EIP and add every subsequent hard fork to the list.
if we ever change the hard fork activation mechanism again (I hope not!!), I'll create a new EIP to supersede this one.
In that case, Final
sounds about the right status. However, would it be better to be a Meta
instead of Informational
if this EIP has binding effect?
Request to add the following topic if time permits
- Report back how the 1st session of AllERCDevs works yesterday and get feedback from EIP Editors.
- Share about the Status proposal and request for feedback for ERC's status advancement criteria
Notes about EIP-6953:
- @xinbenlv and @SamWilsn and @Gajinder discussed, correct me if I was wrong
- Editors agree the to move to
Review
and move in the direction of "Final". - If so, the tables of block number of each upgrade probably need to be moved to some Live EIP if it is intended to be appended in the future.
- Editors also suggest to consider
type
to be "Meta" as opposed to "Informational" but defer to the Author to decide.
- Share about the Status proposal and request for feedback for ERC's status advancement criteria
Propose to add to next meeting agenda
Summary
1. Discuss Open Issues/PRs, and other topics
PR - 6991
- Editors are fine moving the proposal to
Review
. - It should be good to be moved towards
Final
and notLiving
. - Some changes suggested to the author, like removing table of activation
Issues-7027
- Unanimous decision to NOT allow
UNLICENSED
code in EIP document - Open PR to implement this with permission to CC0 only.
- May need further discussion to include other licenses.
Edit to Final EIP: PR- 6937
- Approved and merged
Edit to Final EIP: PR6860
- Need to hear the author's side before recommending documenting a new EIP
2. Discussion continued or updates from past meetings
Progress on EIP number bot
- (waiting for @Pandapip1 's update)
Potential discussion for future meetings
closing in favor of #235