EIP Tags/Labels/Topics
Pandapip1 opened this issue · 20 comments
Proposed Change
Add a new preamble item that allows EIPs to assign themselves "tags" so that users can filter by topic. For example:
---
eip: 5484
title: Consensual Soulbound Tokens
description: Interface for special NFTs with immutable ownership and pre-determined immutable burn authorization
author: Buzz Cai (@buzzcai)
discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-5484-consensual-soulbound-tokens/10424
status: Final
type: Standards Track
category: ERC
created: 2022-08-17
requires: 165, 721
+ tags: nft, soulbound
---
...Would we have a defined list of tags? How would we render this in jekyll?
Would we have a defined list of tags?
No.
How would we render this in jekyll?
With difficulty. It's certainly doable, though, with client-side rendering.
Would we have a defined list of tags?
No.
I think I would be weakly opposed to this change then. I fear it would become just the description, but shorter. I do think the barrier to creating a tag should be quite low, however. That way it would be useful for the EOF or the SIWE family of EIPs.
How would we render this in jekyll?
With difficulty. It's certainly doable, though, with client-side rendering.
🤣 I didn't really mean on a technical level. Like would we subdivide Core / Final by tag, for example?
I think I would be weakly opposed to this change then. I fear it would become just the description, but shorter. I do think the barrier to creating a tag should be quite low, however. That way it would be useful for the EOF or the SIWE family of EIPs.
I guess a small amount of tag curation could be useful. I'd be in support of that compromise.
🤣 I didn't really mean on a technical level. Like would we subdivide
Core / Finalby tag, for example?
Each tag would have a page (/tag/<tag>) that lists the relevant EIPs using the same template as the category-specific pages.
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.
Dismissing stale bot.
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.
Is the consensus that this is a good idea?
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.
Bump
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.
I think that the consensus is that this is a good idea. I'll put together a proposal.
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.
Dismissing shale bot.
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.
Oops somehow didn't get the stale notification for this. Definitely want to keep this open!
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.
Is the consensus that this is good?
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.
Superseded by the EIP Charter thing