Make mend/renovate less frequent and less granular
SamWilsn opened this issue · 13 comments
Proposed Change
Can do a once-a-week or once-a-month batch of updates? The docs seem to suggest that it's possible.
Why would this be desirable over granular PRs?
I believe it was @lightclient who asked for it during an EIPIP. The idea being we get one update PR to go through every month, instead of a ton of small PRs.
I'm honestly not sure where I stand on this. I don't generally go through these PRs because I don't feel comfortable approving them unless I also go through whatever library is being updated.
I'm okay with less frequent, but I want to keep the granularity. Otherwise, it's tricky to debug what causes what to fail, if/when a breaking change is introduced somewhere.
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.
@lightclient thoughts?
I still think we should do this, about 20% of my last 25 github notifications for this repo is mend.
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.
I still think we should do this, about 20% of my last 25 github notifications for this repo is mend.
Would you like me to seperate out CI from governance?
I (and others) have notifications on for all PRs so it doesn't really matter if the bot tags me or not. I just don't think we need the frequency it is currently on.
I‘m in favour of a separation, in the current setting, of CI from governance, preferably as quickly as possible. I think CI is damaging and hindering governance the way it is/was set up.
I think CI is damaging and hindering governance the way it is/was set up.
This is objectively false. CI, as it is currently set up, cannot hinder governance. How did you come to this conclusion?
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity.
This issue was closed due to inactivity. If you are still pursuing it, feel free to reopen it and respond to any feedback.