ethereum/pm

AllCoreDevs Meeting 9 Agenda

Souptacular opened this issue · 6 comments

Souptacular commented

All Core Devs Meeting 9 Agenda

Meeting Date/Time: Wednesday 1/25/17 at 14:00 UTC.

Meeting Duration 1.5 hours

Agenda

Please provide comments to add or correct agenda topics.

  1. Should we set up a set meeting time? The first and third Friday of every month at 14:00 UTC maybe? Given enough notice, we can push these meetings back or forward a week due to major events that multiple core devs will be attending (such as Edcon Feb. 14th).
  2. Come to final agreement on EIP5/8 [Facilitator: Christian]
  3. Precompiles for elliptic curve point addition, elliptic curve scalar multiplication and pairing [Facilitator: Christian]
  4. Metropolis and associated EIPs. [Facilitator: Vitalik]
  1. New general state tests: ethereum/EIPs#176 . [Facilitator: Martin S.]
  2. STATIC_CALL: ethereum/EIPs#116 with additional points to discuss. [Facilitator: Christian]
    Do we want three call variants:
    (1) anything is possible (current call)
    (2) state modifications are disallowed
    (3) state modifications and state reads are disallowed (except for code) furthermore, do we want a special call opcode that fails if the target does not contain code?
  3. EIP 141: EVM opcode: designated invalid instruction. [Facilitator: Christian]
  4. Difficulty bomb block 3.5 mil. is < 3 months away. Reference to previous calculations. [Facilitator: Martin S.]
  5. New EIP GitHub process and cleanup. See details here [Facilitator: Hudson]
chriseth commented
  • Come to final agreement on EIP5/8
  • Precompiles for elliptic curve point addition, elliptic curve scalar multiplication and pairing
holiman commented
chriseth commented

STATIC_CALL: ethereum/EIPs#116 with additional points to discuss:

  • do we want three call variants: (1) anything is possible (current call) (2) state modifications are disallowed (3) state modifications and state reads are disallowed (except for code)
  • furthermore, do we want a special call opcode that fails if the target does not contain code?
holiman commented

How about https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4iozgf/in_around_14_month_the_difficulty_bomb_will_make/d30c0lq/ . It's less than three months left to block 3.5M . If I interpret it correctly, we should plan a HF somewhere within the coming couple of months.

chriseth commented

Oh and this one should be quick: ethereum/EIPs#141 - designated invalid opcode