Ethereum Core Devs Meeting 37 Agenda
lrettig opened this issue · 15 comments
Ethereum Core Devs Meeting 37 Agenda
Meeting Date/Time: Friday 04/20/18 at 14:00 UTC (http://www.timebie.com/std/utc.php)
Meeting Duration 1.5 hours
YouTube Live Stream Link
Agenda
- Testing including: string test_addTransaction(string _jsonTransaction) (continuing conversation from last call)
- EIP 908: Reward for clients and full nodes validating transactions + @MicahZoltu proposal (time did not permit on last call)
- Ben Edgington's proposal that all EIPs ought to contain a PR against the yellow paper before being merged or accepted (continuing conversation from last call)
- EIP 960: Cap total ether supply at ~120 million (continuing conversation from last call)
- EIP 969: Modifications to ethash to invalidate existing dedicated hardware implementations (continuing conversation from last call)
- EIP 999: Restore Contract Code at 0x863DF6BFa4469f3ead0bE8f9F2AAE51c91A907b4
- Research Updates
- Constantinople hard fork timing and what to include (continuing conversation from last call) - Afri: meta-EIP for Constantinople? Hivetests already has tests enabled, Parity failing, cf. openethereum/parity-ethereum#8427.
- Client updates
- Timing of next call (EdCon)
Please provide comments to add or correct agenda topics.
Re (7): Maybe we can start a meta-EIP after this call for Constantinople? Apparently, http://hivetests.ethstats.net/ already has tests enabled, and Parity is failing them because we did not start working on it yet. Ref. openethereum/parity-ethereum#8427
Regarding (2), @MicahZoltu also proposed Incentivizing full state nodes, although that hasn't been made into an EIP.
Updated the agenda to reflect these!
Thanks! You may want to move "Afri: meta-EIP for Constantinople? Hivetests already has tests enabled, Parity failing, cf. openethereum/parity-ethereum#8427." to append it to point 7, and it would also be good to more clearly differentiate the EIP 908 proposal from the full state rewards proposal, e.g.:
EIP 908: Reward for clients and full nodes validating transactions + @MicahZoltu's proposal for [Incentivizing full state nodes](https://ethresear.ch/t/incentivizing-full-state-nodes/1640).
Casper EIP draft has been published ethereum/EIPs#1011
Update on Turbo-Geth: still working on reorg functionality, more detailed report will be delivered at Edcon
Agenda updated! Thanks
What ?? Where is the EIP 969 ?
Is it considered not important to discuss ?
Opposing EIP-960 , EIP-999, and EIP-1011. All of them requires a full consensus of community and it will eventually harm ethereum as a immutable blockchain network.
@cforce07: I added 969 to the agenda for today's call. According to my notes, the place we left this topic on the last call was: "We'll let Piper update the EIP, community discussion will continue and if it's still an important topic to the community we can bring it up again in the next meeting."
Since I realize there are some controversial topics in today's agenda, for avoidance of doubt I've ordered the topics using the following algorithm:
- Items that were on the agenda for the last call which we did not have time to discuss on the last call
- Continuing conversation of items on the agenda for the last call, where we said we would revisit the items in this call
- New items added for this call
Thanks for adding 969 to the agenda!
Thanks, Lane.
My initial question is already partially answered by EIP 1013 that Nick created 👍
I am going to update EIP 908 with more details on the specification and the rationale. I left a comment on the Gitter discussion for EIP-908 with more details.
I edited the EIP.