Race condition in destroy method
8749236 opened this issue · 0 comments
What version of this package are you using?
Version: Commit d1c0ebe
Platform: Windows 10, Chrome Version 94.0.4606.81 (Official Build) (64-bit)
Problem:
peer.destroy() method has potential race condition
How (my interpretation)
It unhooks peer._channel.onclose
, to avoid infinite recursion (since closing data channel will invoke peer.destroy()
method)
Then calls _channel.close()
and _pc.close()
sequentially.
But order of execution is not guaranteed to be the same as they were called
Occasionally peer connection is closed before data channel is closed, causing remote peer to throw "RTCError Transport channel closed".
Expected:
When peer.destroy() method is called, remote peer should not experience any error.
Work around:
call peer._channel.close()
to destroy peer
Writing pull request:
I am reluctant to write a pull request since I do not have full picture of the library and I may introduce more bugs with my own changes.
I will only write pull request if I am sure it is bug free.
My intent is to submit this issue for bug confirmation.
Reproducible code:
// Run it few more times, error should occur randomly
peerA = new Peer({ initiator: true });
peerB = new Peer({ initiator: false });
peerA.on('signal', s => peerB.signal(s));
peerB.on('signal', s => peerA.signal(s));
peerA.on("error", console.warn);
peerB.on("error", console.warn);
setTimeout(peerA.destroy.bind(peerA), 100);
// Work around
// setTimeout(peerA._channel.close.bind(peerA._channel), 100)