Misplaced price assumption
Closed this issue · 1 comments
nk027 commented
Here https://github.com/nk027/fabio/blob/5db43338a24bd86db7bf8b3b8212a2cc9b63cda0/R/8_mrio.R#L45 missing prices are implicitly equated to 1.
- I don't think that's a reasonable assumption
- This should be done earlier on, when building the supply table (same for the value column)
martinbruckner commented
That's intended and unproblematic, as the values are only needed to split by-products.