add a license
Closed this issue · 6 comments
We should add a licence (file) to this repository.
Valid point, everything should have a license. I suggest and usually use MIT as it is as liberal as it gets and has no strings attached. I could also settle with BSD 3-clause or BSD 2-clause. GPL is far too blown up for this small stuff.
As far as I can see, these other people have up to now contributed to this repository:
Could all of them please leave a short notice here, with which of the above-mentioned licenses they agree, or suggest alternatives if absolutely necessary.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
I'm fine with all of them.
On 12.01.2015 19:03, Jan-Philipp Litza wrote:
Valid point, everything should have a license. I suggest and usually
use MIT http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT as it is as liberal as it
gets and has no strings attached. I could also settle with BSD 3-clause
http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause or BSD 2-clause
http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause. GPL is far too blown up
for this small stuff.As far as I can see, these other people have up to now contributed to
this repository:
- @tcatm https://github.com/tcatm
- @thomasDOTde https://github.com/thomasDOTde
- @kpcyrd https://github.com/kpcyrd (splitting off the formatter,
804eb16
804eb16)Could all of them please leave a short notice here, with which of the
above-mentioned licenses they agree, or suggest alternatives if
absolutely necessary.—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9 (comment).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUtA2UAAoJED0ncubs34cjeQkIAKjGy6k/so3GXACfZ1m/tond
3P1O5a8GsccDu5nFHEzgJC/diXSLc/DTXRTY7izSFZHpIgURoEYQRHqvnBzavvjo
u224T3COkIWcoVKFKzz3bQ+s9lKhPAHjugPLiUFn76GJMrrBY3OZDNo8ZlOsLFYz
4v4coR5G1Q06tYekRgyl0jAeezB3qMuK1jahWPMrXLuH2LEYCnjl6IQBw1ddhzZl
Y8JIQLK8ZSiAChvCZuwBa5nmB3BAwySK+VukLkm6NlSY+9gRDgonQlt7iDYzttVj
9XUJ+k2J4gwPTX6vSHjDFrTucb07guU8VcSJ7FZP8Sy54Zs/F+Ik6nEnxXUUuqY=
=mOOg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I'm fine with any of the mentioned licenses, too.
I'm ok with any of the mentioned licenses.
I added MIT and struggled a bit with the "copyright holders" placeholder. I ended up entering Nils and myself by name, and added "and others" at the end for two reasons:
Some project keep a AUTHORS file for this reason, e.g. the django project: https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/AUTHORS