freifunk/icvpn-scripts

add a license

Closed this issue · 6 comments

booo commented

We should add a licence (file) to this repository.

Valid point, everything should have a license. I suggest and usually use MIT as it is as liberal as it gets and has no strings attached. I could also settle with BSD 3-clause or BSD 2-clause. GPL is far too blown up for this small stuff.

As far as I can see, these other people have up to now contributed to this repository:

Could all of them please leave a short notice here, with which of the above-mentioned licenses they agree, or suggest alternatives if absolutely necessary.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

I'm fine with all of them.

On 12.01.2015 19:03, Jan-Philipp Litza wrote:

Valid point, everything should have a license. I suggest and usually
use MIT http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT as it is as liberal as it
gets and has no strings attached. I could also settle with BSD 3-clause
http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause or BSD 2-clause
http://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause. GPL is far too blown up
for this small stuff.

As far as I can see, these other people have up to now contributed to
this repository:

Could all of them please leave a short notice here, with which of the
above-mentioned licenses they agree, or suggest alternatives if
absolutely necessary.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#9 (comment).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUtA2UAAoJED0ncubs34cjeQkIAKjGy6k/so3GXACfZ1m/tond
3P1O5a8GsccDu5nFHEzgJC/diXSLc/DTXRTY7izSFZHpIgURoEYQRHqvnBzavvjo
u224T3COkIWcoVKFKzz3bQ+s9lKhPAHjugPLiUFn76GJMrrBY3OZDNo8ZlOsLFYz
4v4coR5G1Q06tYekRgyl0jAeezB3qMuK1jahWPMrXLuH2LEYCnjl6IQBw1ddhzZl
Y8JIQLK8ZSiAChvCZuwBa5nmB3BAwySK+VukLkm6NlSY+9gRDgonQlt7iDYzttVj
9XUJ+k2J4gwPTX6vSHjDFrTucb07guU8VcSJ7FZP8Sy54Zs/F+Ik6nEnxXUUuqY=
=mOOg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

I'm fine with any of the mentioned licenses, too.

I'm ok with any of the mentioned licenses.

I added MIT and struggled a bit with the "copyright holders" placeholder. I ended up entering Nils and myself by name, and added "and others" at the end for two reasons:

  • the git log doesn't state realnames for @kpcyrd and @thomasDOTde, and I wasn't sure if they should be mentioned
  • Nils and I have contributed the most [1]
    If anybody is not okay with that, please file a pull request with fixes, this is just a suggestion.
booo commented

Some project keep a AUTHORS file for this reason, e.g. the django project: https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/AUTHORS