duplicates in conjdup_log.txt - some explanations and explorations

[drdhaval2785]

https://github.com/funderburkjim/elispsanskrit/blob/master/pysanskritv1/dhaval/conjtab/conjdup_log.txt seems to have recorded places where there are more than one separate entries in the verbdata whose output for 'Present tense' is identical.

These are the major patterns.

1. 6th gaNa entries like dfpa! pre 06.0356P :: dfmpa! pre 06.0037P. This may be caused by sUtra अनिदितां हल उपधायाः क्ङिति (6.4.24), which elided the nasal 'm' and gave the identical forms for both. But there are conditions here. So, may not be applicable in all verb forms.
2. wuBrAjf! pre 01.0205A :: BrAjf! pre 01.0957A - 'wu','qu','Yi' are prefixes which get elided. They have specific usages elsewhere in grammar. Therefore the verb forms of present tense seem identical. Maybe all forms are identical. The usefulness is more in कृदन्त forms. I am not sure. Need to investigate.
3. kawI! pre 01.0330P :: kawe! pre 01.0359P - Here the anubandha is different. 'I' / 'e' get deleted by तस्य लोपः. So forms seem identical. The anubandhas serve different purposes. So, they are different verbs.
4. miTf! pre 01.1008A :: meTf! pre 01.1009A - Here the 'i' gets converted to 'e' by पुगन्तलघूपधस्य च. Therefore, both give identical forms. The difference is in मिथ्यते / मेथ्यते. The same will be the case in 'u'/'o' pairs also. see luqa! pre 01.0352P :: loqf! pre 01.0413P.

These may give some idea about the items which can be force matched.

The remaining items need serious consideration.