SanskritVerb-Pysan comparison, present tense NOT class 10, part 2
Opened this issue · 2 comments
funderburkjim commented
Changes to pysanskrit
These changes to pysanskrit bring pysanskrit algorithms into agreement with SanskritVerb.
class 2
DONE s:Iq:Iwwe:Iwte,Iwwe:3s # Iq:stutO:02:0183:A:sew
DONE s:IS:Izwe:IsDe:3s # IS:ESvarye:02:0010:A:sew
DONE s:Ir:Irte:Iste:3s # Ir:gatO kampane ca:02:0342:A:sew
class 7
; and vid
; for these roots, SanskritVerb has two alternate forms in several cases,
; and Pysan has been recoded to also show these alternate forms,
; one with a duplication and one without a duplication.
; For Cfd, at least, Kale shows only the form with duplication.
; Dhaval needs to check confirmation for both forms.
DONE s:Cfd:Cfnte,Cfntte:Cfntte:3s # Cfd:dIptidevanayoH:07:0352:u:sew # Cfd:sandIpane:07:0008:u:sew
DONE s:Cfd:CfntaH,CfnttaH:CfnttaH:3d # Cfd:dIptidevanayoH:07:0352:u:sew # Cfd:sandIpane:07:0008:u:sew
DONE s:tfd:tfnte,tfntte:tfntte:3s # tfd:hiMsAnAdarayoH:07:0009:u:sew
DONE s:tfd:tfntaH,tfnttaH:tfnttaH:3d # tfd:hiMsAnAdarayoH:07:0009:u:sew
DONE s:und:untaH,unttaH:unttaH:3d # und:kledane:07:0020:pa:sew
DONE s:kft:kfntaH,kfnttaH:kfnttaH:3d # kft:vezwane:07:0010:pa:sew
NOTE: there is still a difference in kft 7P in 1s and 1p (see later)
DONE s:kzud:kzunte,kzuntte:kzuntte:3s # kzud:samprezaRe:07:0006:u:aniw
DONE s:kzud:kzuntaH,kzunttaH:kzunttaH:3d # kzud:samprezaRe:07:0006:u:aniw
DONE s:Kid:Kinte,Kintte:Kintte:3s # Kid:dEnye:07:0012:A:aniw
DONE s:Cid:Cinte,Cintte:Cintte:3s # Cid:dvEDIkaraRe:07:0003:u:aniw
DONE s:Cid:CintaH,CinttaH:CinttaH:3d # Cid:dvEDIkaraRe:07:0003:u:aniw
DONE s:inD:inDe,indDe:indDe:3s # inD:dIptO:07:0011:A:sew
DONE s:Bid:Binte,Bintte:Bintte:3s # Bid:vidAraRe:07:0002:u:aniw
DONE s:Bid:BintaH,BinttaH:BinttaH:3d # Bid:vidAraRe:07:0002:u:aniw
DONE s:ruD:runDe,rundDe:rundDe:3s # ruD:AvaraRe:07:0001:u:aniw
DONE s:ruD:runDaH,rundDaH:rundDaH:3d # ruD:AvaraRe:07:0001:u:aniw
DONE s:vid:vinte,vintte:vintte:3s # vid:lABe:07:0013:u:sew # vid:vicAraRe:07:0232:A:aniw
In these class 7 roots (tfh, piz, Siz, hiMs)
SanskritVerb uses anusvAra M, while Pysanskrit uses nasal homorganic with
the following consonant.
In this case, Pysanskrit has been changed to agree with SanskritVerb.
DONE s:tfh:tfMhanti:tfNhanti:3p # tfh:hiMsAyAm:07:0018:pa:sew
DONE s:piz:piMzwaH:piRzwaH:3d # piz:saYcUrRane:07:0015:pa:aniw
DONE s:Siz:SiMzwaH:SiRzwaH:3d # Siz:asarvopayoge:07:0014:u:sew # Siz:viSezaRe:07:0349:pa:aniw
DONE s:hiMs:hiMstaH:hinstaH:3d # hiMs:hiMsAyAm:07:0366:pa:sew
class 2
; UrRu. Kale 2U AcCadane to cover to hide; UrRoti, UrROti or UrRute.
DONE s:UrRu:UrROti,UrRoti:UrROti:3s # UrRu:AcCAdane:02:0034:u:sew
DONE s:kaS:kazwe:kasDe:3s # kaS:gatiSAsanayoH ityanye ityapi:02:0016:A:sew
DONE s:cakz:cakze:cakkze:2s # cakz:vyaktAyAM vAci ayaM darSane'pi:02:0007:A:aniw
; mfj 2A # Kale. For class 2, only shows P.
; Presume the 2A 2p form mfqQve of SanskritVerb is correct.
DONE sq:mfj:mfqQve:mfjJve:2p # mfj:mfjU!S SudDO:02:0386:pa:sew # mfj:SOcAlaNkArayoH:02:0061:u:sew
; vac. Kale #434, for class 2, KaleDK shows only P (not A)
; And, for 2P, shows deficient in 3rd. pl.
DONE s:vac:vacate:_:3p # vac:pariBAzaRe:02:0058:u:sew # vac:pariBAzaRe:02:0380:pa:aniw
DONE s:vaS:vazwi:vasDi:3s # vaS:kAntO:02:0075:pa:sew
# niYj, piYj, pfYj, vfYj, SiYj in 2A
# Pysan and SanskritVerb disagree in 3s, 2s, 2p.
# Kale has all forms for niYj, and agrees with SanskritVerb.
# Thus, I conclude that SanskritVerb is correct in these cases,
# and have so changed Pysanskrit to enforce this agreement.
DONE s:niYj:niNkte:niYcce,niYcte:3s # niYj:SudDO:02:0018:A:sew
DONE s:piYj:piNkte:piYcce,piYcte:3s # piYj:BAzArTaH:02:0020:u:sew # piYj:varRe samparcana ityeke uBayannetyanye avayava ityapare avyakte Sabda itItare:02:0020:A:sew
DONE s:pfYj:pfNkte:pfYcce,pfYcte:3s # pfYj:varRe samparcana ityeke uBayannetyanye avayava ityapare avyakte Sabda itItare ityeke:02:0021:A:sew
DONE s:vfYj:vfNkte:vfYcce,vfYcte:3s # vfYj:varjane ityeke:02:0023:A:sew
DONE s:SiYj:SiNkte:SiYcce,SiYcte:3s # SiYj:avyakte Sabde:02:0019:A:sew
DONE s:vfj:vfkte:vfcce,vfcte:3s # vfj:varjane:02:0024:A:sew
# piYj 2P: Pysan and Sanverb disagree in 3s, 3d, 2s, 2d, 2p.
Kale has no direct exemplar. But, I assume that SanskritVerb is correct
in this case also, as it is for piYj 2A. Pysan corrected to agree with
Sanverb
# saMst. MW refers to 'sas'. Kale has no saMst, but has
# sas 2P svapne (to sleep); sasti
# The Kale verb probably is 'zasa!' in verbdata:
zasa!:svapne:sas:02:0073:pa:sew:ष॑सँ॑:728:750:767:sas1_Rasaz_axAxiH+svapne:
# in verbdata, saMst is:
zasti!:svapne:saMst:02:0074:pa:sew:ष॑स्तिँ॑:728::767:saMsw2_Raswiz_axAxiH+svapne:
saMst:saMsti,saMstti:saMstti:3s # saMst:svapne:02:0074:pa:sew
There are two kinds of differences between sanverb and pysan:
in 3s, 3d, 2d, 2p SanskritVerb has two forms, one with duplication of 't'
and one without duplication. Pysan has only the form with duplication:
3s (sanverb) saMsti,saMstti != saMstti (pysan)
3d (sanverb) saMstaH,saMsttaH != saMsttaH (pysan)
2d (sanverb) saMsTaH,saMstTaH != saMstTaH (pysan)
2p (sanverb) saMsTa,saMstTa != saMstTa (pysan)
Is this difference due to an optional sandhi?
Similar to the optional forms under class 7 roots Cfd, etc. above,
I am changing Pysan to have SanskritVerb's alternate forms for saMst.
class 3
DONE s:viz:veviqQve:vevizQve:2p # viz:vyAptO:03:0014:u:aniw
DONE s:hrI:jihriyati:jihryati:3p # hrI:lajjAyAm:03:0003:pa:aniw
drdhaval2785 commented
Regarding
In these class 7 roots (tfh, piz, Siz, hiMs)
SanskritVerb uses anusvAra M, while Pysanskrit uses nasal homorganic with
the following consonant.
In this case, Pysanskrit has been changed to agree with SanskritVerb.
DONE s:tfh:tfMhanti:tfNhanti:3p # tfh:hiMsAyAm:07:0018:pa:sew
DONE s:piz:piMzwaH:piRzwaH:3d # piz:saYcUrRane:07:0015:pa:aniw
DONE s:Siz:SiMzwaH:SiRzwaH:3d # Siz:asarvopayoge:07:0014:u:sew #
Siz:viSezaRe:07:0349:pa:aniw
DONE s:hiMs:hiMstaH:hinstaH:3d # hiMs:hiMsAyAm:07:0366:pa:sew
There is no nasal homorganic for 'Szsh'. Therefore question doesnt arise.
funderburkjim commented
In these cases, pysanskrit used 'M' before termination beginning with a dental, while SanskritVerb uses
'n'. I have changed pysanskrit to use 'n'.
The final present conjugations are:
kaMs pre 2A:[kaMste kaMsAte kaMsate kaMsse kaMsATe kanDve kaMse kaMsvahe kaMsmahe]
niMs pre 2A:[niMste niMsAte niMsate niMsse niMsATe ninDve niMse niMsvahe niMsmahe]
ruMs pre 10A:[ruMsayate ruMsayete ruMsayante ruMsayase ruMsayeTe ruMsayaDve ruMsaye ruMsayAvahe ruMsayAmahe]
This change was also made in jan 3P, but Sanskritverb and pysan still disagree in the 3p (this difference
is mentioned in next issue)
pysan:jan pre 3P:[jajanti jajantaH jajanati jajaMsi jajanTaH jajanTa jajanmi jajanvaH jajanmaH]
sanverb:jan pre 3P:[jajanti jajantaH jajYati jajaMsi jajanTaH jajanTa jajanmi jajanvaH jajanmaH]