Rewrite Facts Documentation
Closed this issue · 6 comments
Description
Looking at the facts documentation page it is very outdated and needs to be rewritten.
Thinks to rework:
- Add section on why you would want to use facts/why are they useful.
- Explain the two base types of facts,
Readable
andWritable
. Some fact types are both, others are read-only.Readable
facts can be used in the criteria of an entry.Writable
can be used in the modifiers. - List various possibilities to use facts and explain which one could be used.
- An example of this could be. Gathering items quest where a player taks to an npc and needs to gather items. This would include the Inventory Item Count Fact when the user talks to the npc
- Another example could be to use a Permanent Fact for keeping track of progression. Like (0 is not started) (1 is talked to an npc) (2 is done some action) (3 is finished quest). Make a little story with this to make it specific to a situation.
- Include at least 3 more, preferably 5.
- From the previous list give a step by step instruction on how to set up for only 1 (though somewhat complex)
Any additional additions are more than welcome!
Required
- Some git experience to clone the repo, make the changes and create a pull request.
I want to help
Great! Reply with I want to claim this bounty!
. Only claim if you have time. We want to get this bounty out of the way as quickly as possible!
Then fork the repository and switch to the feature/documentation
branch.
I want to claim this bounty!
I want to claim this bounty!
I want to claim this bounty!
@Gc-network was quicker so I'll give him the bounty. That said, I see you can code. Could you help me out with #99? If so leave a comment there!
@gabber235 This was my first bounty tast 🥲! But thats fine. Anyway I would love to help, and one question, can I get bounty for #99?
@Gc-network This was my first bounty tast 🥲! But thats fine. Do I get bounty for #99?
Yea @vignan37 will work together on it. When completed I'll give you the bounty hunter role :)
Bdw keep the pr for this open, when @Gc-network has done his part. I will likely combine them to get the best of both.
Sure @gabber235 🍻