Key code to key name are not necessary one to one mapping

Question

Key code to key name are not necessary one to one mapping

Opened this issue 7 years ago · 1 comments

Currently the code assume key code and key name are one-to-one mapping.
Actually it is not, e.g. BTN_MISC and BTN_0 have same key code.
This will result in some key name not working property in conf file.

Answer 1 · 2017-12-20T21:40:14.000Z

Thanks for the report! :)
Unfortunately, this is unlikely to be changed, as I do not maintain this project anymore.

If anybody would like to take ownership of this project and maintain it, please let me know - I'm happy to transfer the GitHub repository to someone else (and potentially change the license to MIT or something more appropriate).