Poor SF prefixes in the class names

Question

Poor SF prefixes in the class names

Closed this issue 7 years ago · 1 comments

This is just a nitpick, but the "SF" prefixes in the class names, I feel like they are named poorly. Nowadays I think they're not needed since C++ namespace can avoid the name collisions.

Answer 1 · 2018-02-01T04:14:56.000Z

Some struct names are direct copy from SoundFont 2 specification. I think they should not be changed.

After all, I probably will keep the current names.