haarts/bech32

Licensing is inconsistent

Opened this issue · 0 comments

AaronFeickert commented

The licensing for the project is inconsistent:

  • the GitHub informational sidebar for the repository indicates an MIT license
  • the pub.dev page for the project indicates an MIT license
  • the LICENSE file contains MIT license text
  • the README file indicates an AGPL license

Presumably the intent is for the project to fall under the MIT license, but it would be helpful to have this clarified.