Should we close the session when streams receive window exceeded ?

[hayden-pan]

After read about the stream receive window code, I found when a stream's receive window exceeded, the error will cause the session's recvLoop() return and then the session shutdown.

If above is correct, when stream is individual, why a stream's receive window exceeded(usually caused by stream's consumer been stuck) make the session shutdown and then stop all other streams? Can we only close the problem stream and return the error message to it's consumer ?

[aaftio]

I have notice that there is a sendWindow indicate the other side stream remain recvWindow. So the only possible of receive window exceeded is a bug? If it is right, I will close this issues.