Error message can be improved when command does not follow format
Opened this issue · 1 comments
heyzec commented
soc-pe-bot commented
Team's Response
- If we were to implement this, parsing would be very difficult.
- 5 College Avenue East could also be a valid address. Then the error message would be correct.
Items for the Tester to Verify
❓ Issue response
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
- I disagree
Reason for disagreement: I don't think the validity of the arguments has anything to do with whether the error message is correct. The meesage is incorrect here because the at least one field to edit must be provided. Format of commands should be checked before validity.
❓ Issue type
Team chose [type.FeatureFlaw
]
Originally [type.FunctionalityBug
]
- I disagree
Reason for disagreement: My reason is same as above.