Polish the readme based on feedback

[hnarayanan]

I like that the README starts with a description of what the software
is all about. I like that the copyright license is stated explicitly.

I would perhaps add a few words explaining what Spotify is, to save
readers from having to follow a link. Not a big deal, though.

I would perhaps move the installation instructions to after the usage
description. I'd prefer to get some idea of what the software is like
to use before I worry about installing it.

[davidem]

To be honest: imho the readme is quite alright as it currently is 😎. Yes, you can explain 'spotify', but I think there aren't many people who don't know what spotify is. Perhaps you can add "audio streaming service" before the spotify link.

I think it is common to explain how to install software before explaining how to use it. You might explain a few of the possibilities of shpotify in the introduction, then talk about installation and then the detailed usage instructions. Or add a cool gif made with terminalizer as an introduction. 😁

Cheers,

David

[hnarayanan]

Thank you. This is not my feedback, this is just me quoting a person who offered this service as a gesture. (They read READMEs knowing nothing about your project and offer their feedback.) I’m not what parts of it I will act on if any. 😅