Update_entry not propagating new entry?

[guillemcordoba]

In this project: https://github.com/guillemcordoba/hc-badges, I'm using the update_entry call to update the badge entry with new claims that the user should receive the badge. This is the flow:

1 - Alice creates a badge class -> commit_entry(badge_class)
2 - Alice creates an empty badge for Bob -> commit_entry(empty_badge_for_bob_for_previous_badge_class)
3 - Alice claims that Bob should receive that badge -> update_entry(badge_previously created, with alice as issuer)

Then, when executing get_entry, Alice returns the updated entry, but Bob never receives the update (only sees the first empty badge entry created in 2). Seems like the update_entry is not propagating via DHT, but the commit_entry is.

If it helps, this test demonstrates the issue, in these lines:

    await s.consistency();

    // This works!
    result = await alice.call("badges_instance", "badges", "get_entry", {
      address: claimAddr.Ok
    });

    badge = JSON.parse(result.Ok.App[1]);
    t.deepEqual(badge, {
      recipient: bobAddress,
      badge_class: addr.Ok,
      issuers: [aliceAddress],
      evidences: []
    });

    // This fails! (issuers are empty)
    result = await bob.call("badges_instance", "badges", "get_entry", {
      address: claimAddr.Ok
    });

    badge = JSON.parse(result.Ok.App[1]);
    t.deepEqual(badge, {
      recipient: bobAddress,
      badge_class: addr.Ok,
      issuers: [aliceAddress],
      evidences: []
    });

I'm using hc 0.0.41-alpha4.

[pdaoust]

Hi @guillemcordoba I'm just discovering this issue now; did it get resolved with 0.0.42-alpha5?

[guillemcordoba]

No, it didn't... Actually I got to confirm it with different experiments I've been doing.

[pdaoust]

Oh, I just thought of something -- what network setup are you using for your tests? All the work is being put into sim2h right now, so it's most likely to be bug-free.

[guillemcordoba]

Mmm it was sim2h... I tried with postman as well and conductors talking to each other with sim2h as well, with same result.

[guillemcordoba]

Just realized it is working in the last version (42-alpha5)... So sorry for the inconvenience... Closing this.