Lutron Caseta will report the opposite entity state after restart or reload
iCSpotRun opened this issue · 2 comments
The problem
After restarting Home Assistant, or reloading the Integration, Lutron Caseta 'cover' entities (on RA3 at least), will report the opposite state that they are actually in. i.e. A cover that is 'closed' will report as 'open' after restart and vice versa.
The problem doesn't seem to affect all Lutron Caseta devices. In my case, only covers are impacted. Lights and Switches seem unaffected.
What version of Home Assistant Core has the issue?
core-2024.7.1
What was the last working version of Home Assistant Core?
No response
What type of installation are you running?
Home Assistant OS
Integration causing the issue
Lutron Caseta
Link to integration documentation on our website
https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/lutron_caseta/
Diagnostics information
home-assistant_lutron_caseta_2024-07-05T17-24-19.860Z.log
Example YAML snippet
No response
Anything in the logs that might be useful for us?
No response
Additional information
No response
Hey there @swails, @bdraco, @danaues, @eclair4151, mind taking a look at this issue as it has been labeled with an integration (lutron_caseta
) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!
Code owner commands
Code owners of lutron_caseta
can trigger bot actions by commenting:
@home-assistant close
Closes the issue.@home-assistant rename Awesome new title
Renames the issue.@home-assistant reopen
Reopen the issue.@home-assistant unassign lutron_caseta
Removes the current integration label and assignees on the issue, add the integration domain after the command.@home-assistant add-label needs-more-information
Add a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) to the issue.@home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information
Remove a label (needs-more-information, problem in dependency, problem in custom component) on the issue.
(message by CodeOwnersMention)
lutron_caseta documentation
lutron_caseta source
(message by IssueLinks)
This issue persists and prevents me from using conditions involving cover states since those states cannot be trusted