hop-protocol/hop-airdrop

Sybil Attacker Report

Opened this issue · 1 comments

Related Addresses

0x833a0454bd5ebcb9f56b0fe9f8b857fbe094934b
0x7370f377359fcdd379845ee24b7847ea6d16c6db
0x22021bb4404a637cc82cbff53bd30f9c16083095
0x79fba65f42731e4a4db8472f0b2a5b48d0b4e7f9
0x0d7f4c479c8057eef1e1d3a73b142d416595e751
0x2cdf60d6e5943a40e940dcfb619897c77daa73f0
0xa546dbdbc1b1d69ef4c66d70194354e0a610aa9b
0x299c06e5379924884f8d5cc9112e6c338178f884
0xbfcd63b944edcec14cb4c3b6c8e02e520a521ad2
0x4c078cb14b2d321231a90089195317968957896d
0x099dCC6077f1d656F6FF65b7d1763C85c84ad051
0x6d8624cdc097a525e8b36763c6df284b15dc8d64

Reasoning

All these addresses used Hop Bridge in a short period of Time. These addresses has Mostly 2 transactions but all the transactions are made on 1 Day. These addresses used Hop Bridge for Airdrop rather using it Organically.

IMG_20220524_001611
Used 1 Day.pdf

Methodology

Collected some Airdrop Hunters wallet addresses from Debank Discord and checked all of them manually in Hop Explorer.

Rewards Address

0x0fB267a11d0a4ee611a3A8Dc41147A5729276161

@KaranRoy007

Thank you for the submission. Unfortunately, this submission does not meet one of the criteria for submissions:

Methodology that has a non-negligible chance of eliminating legitimate users will not be considered

Can you please provide additional information, such as:

  • Identical transactions on the exact same day/time by most or all of the addresses
  • A trace of the ERC20 token between addresses (as opposed to native tokens)
  • A similar time/date that all the addresses started transacting on a chain

Please let us know if you can provide this data. Thank you for your work.