Sybil Attacker Report
Closed this issue · 1 comments
Related Addresses
0x13c31d43bb05ec526fc41440b17a06872882e172
0x501c55d242422811440b6866c7d9a7e74a73bcd7
0x7ab827b64bca65804f98cf4d0d4d990361377124
0xa43df556c9d48a0202c42496f236d4a04752d3ee
0xaca89bbcea89be5b7affd2598994fc465b39a723
0xb2eef2dd33a58c0dd3f2ad9390a13533bfd23cd4
0xf389c517d6a07e07faf03a1f0fe67d57c3760cfc
Reasoning
they are related to other part, who are already eliminated for sybil attack:
0x074806bcedd902627bf19e19231f68a68717c9a5
0x0fe29bcc01e203d3172726599fa04a815c437cc1
0x19eb478ae9d013313659d8e333cddd8a0590c5f6
0x1f29f9bd6db56c25e46d6933c19baa60d00edc18
0x223d5e5493c91cf9947c255052016aea68f89a21
0x86cc9b7e437b6fd0e95bfbc968b6f5d93880795c
0xcbadf6880566bbb360e313cd95d67c8dfde1ab7b
0xd836c0bd51625236b137a042864da40e392c6a61
0xda1a32adecb9b826b52570334be4759ad481b0fc
0xe62776c1462fa66bd2e70e0db89ef8b62df84414
It is a reopening of my previous report #601 that was marked as "Invalid"
I know that I reporting only 7 new wallets in this report. But they are part of a bigger batch of sybil attacker wallets combination (reported by other user in #540).
10 wallets of this batch was already eliminated. But extra 7 wallets founded by me are not. It is a group of 17 wallets in total!
Partially eliminating made in previous report doesn't make other part of this 17 wallets sybil attacker fair, I think.
Methodology
Methodology is described in my previous report #601
Rewards Address
0x72153F1040BDfe6961bB73448f1AF265B2bFDf0b
Thank you for the submission. Unfortunately, the submission period has ended so this will not be reviewed.
I will now close this issue but I will label it with the "Submitted After Deadline" label in the hopes that others might use this data in the future.