Question about the overall pipeline of QueryTrack.
kay-Lifeng opened this issue · 7 comments
Dear author:
In Contrastive Tracking Head, the Track_Dynconv utilize the q*t-1 as shown in Equation (4).
Why didn‘t it show in Figure 1: Overall pipeline of QueryTrack? There is no arrow connection between them.
Thank you!
Hi, @kay-Lifeng ! Thanks for your kind suggestion. For the Contrastive Tracking Head, we use the same DynamicConv
module as MaskHead
. Indeed there should have one arrow to indicate the whole procedure. Sorry about the ambiguity and we will make the figure correct in the next revision!
Hi, @kay-Lifeng ! Thanks for your kind suggestion. For the Contrastive Tracking Head, we use the same
DynamicConv
module asMaskHead
. Indeed there should have one arrow to indicate the whole procedure. Sorry about the ambiguity and we will make the figure correct in the next revision!
Hi, dear author, when the code about QueryTrack would be published?
Hi, @HITerStudy !
Please refer to #19 and thanks for your interest in our work.
I'm closing this issue but let us know if you have any further questions.
Hi, @kay-Lifeng ! Thanks for your kind suggestion. For the Contrastive Tracking Head, we use the same
DynamicConv
module asMaskHead
. Indeed there should have one arrow to indicate the whole procedure. Sorry about the ambiguity and we will make the figure correct in the next revision!
For the DynamicConv
module in the Contrastive Tracking Head, is the value of roi_feat_size
14? Or it is equal to 7? Looking forward to your reply!
We try both 7 and 14 and find that use roi_feat_size=14
does not provide better results.
We try both 7 and 14 and find that use
roi_feat_size=14
does not provide better results.
Thank you!