License unclear

Question

License unclear

hlef opened this issue 7 years ago · 10 comments

Hi Julien,

I am about to package AJPy for Debian, but found out that the license of AJPy isn't well defined. The header in ajp.py looks like a BSD license, but since you didn't include it completely, I can't know if it's a BSD-2, 3 or 4 clause. Can you clarify this point?

Thanks for your work !

Answer 1 · 2018-02-27T09:51:48.000Z

Hi Hugo,

Thank you for your interest in packaging AJPy. I will try to clarify this ASAP.

Answer 2 · 2018-03-05T16:31:19.000Z

Hi Hugo,

I changed the license header of ajpy/ajpy.py file to BSD-4 license format. Let me know if something is blocking you in the packaging process.

Answer 3 · 2018-03-10T16:10:01.000Z

Thanks ! However setup.py is still specifying "License :: OSI Approved :: GNU Library or Lesser General Public License (LGPL)", which may be somewhat misleading. Is it intentional ?

Answer 4 · 2018-03-10T16:22:49.000Z

My bad, I will change the license in the setup.py tomorrow.

Answer 5 · 2018-03-12T08:56:46.000Z

The license has been updated in setup.py and pushed to pypi.

Answer 6 · 2018-03-24T08:25:20.000Z

Thanks, I have just uploaded the package to the Debian archive.

Answer 7 · 2018-03-24T18:54:13.000Z

Hi Hugo,

Thank you for the package. However, AJPy only works with python 2.7 currently. I will add the support of python 3 later.

Answer 8 · 2018-03-25T19:13:55.000Z

I just committed a fix to support python 3 (and python 2 compatible). I tested with a custom tomcat.py to make sure all code is covered.

Answer 9 · 2018-04-14T16:12:30.000Z

Thanks. python-ajpy was just accepted into unstable, and I have uploaded your fix for Python 3 support.

Answer 10 · 2018-04-15T07:57:34.000Z

Thank you Hugo for your work!