[Question] Support for more SSGs
Opened this issue · 9 comments
Is there a documented way to add support for other SSGs?
Hi there, thanks for the issue.
Sadly not yet, though something like this is planned. I'll add the enhancement label
By the way, now that Jekyll is supported, I can start adding new SSGs from now on. Let me know, which ones you would be interested in.
@iakmds It would be nice if you could add support for Franklin
Repo link here: https://github.com/tlienart/Franklin.jl
@iakmds Any plans on this?
If not, do you have a guide which users can use to add SSGs themselves?
I looked into it and it seems to be possible to implement.
What would you specifically like to see with BuhoCMS and Franklin? BuhoCMS could probably support these options:
- Create a site
- Create a file
- Start a server/Build a site (same process in Franklin?)
@iakmds I think most of what Jekyll supports can be done by Franklin
So as such, is it feasible to implement all the same stuff as Jekyll?
It depends on what you mean by most of what Jekyll supports. Because BuhoCMS currently supports 4 general actions for static site generators:
- Create a site
- Create a post
- Start a live server
- Build the website
Is that what you wish for, or are you talking about more specific features?
@iakmds For now, that would be good!
Is it possible to make more feature requests for BuhoCMS + Franklin after the initial implementation is complete and has been merged?
Hi, you could make feature requests, but don't expect them to be implemented very soon, as I'll try to focus on supporting more SSGs and fixing bugs. Once I've created a system for SSG specific features though, I will take a look at it!