jautz/kraus

kraus has no license

Closed this issue · 3 comments

toke commented
kraus has no license

Thanks for the hint. We should discuss this issue in KRAUS and determine an appropriate licence together.

The discussion in our lunch break did not produce a unanimous resolution. The usual suspects of FLOSS licenses have been brought up: Apache, Artistic, BSD, GNU, Mozilla.
So your benevolent dictator has made up his mind and licensed K.R.A.U.S. under the Apache License, Version 2.0.

jautz commented

Message to my future self: With choosealicense.com there is a good starting point helping developers to choose the license that fits to their requirements / ideals.

What I like about the Apache License 2.0 is that it seems to offer the best patent protections among the permissive licenses -- article found via software patents wiki.