jazzband/website

What is the process?

lanshark opened this issue · 4 comments

Hi All,

LOVE the idea of Jazzband, but a bit unsure of 'how it works'...

For instance, I've just joined, and actually created a PR of the site, mostly cleaning up/correcting grammar and language issues. I've posted the PR here.

Obviously, I COULD merge it, and force the change.

But, what is the 'desired process'? Is there a Code Review? Do I need to get approval of some number of other members? What should the desired process be?

Second, How do I know if anyone is working a particular issue? I would rather collaborate, or attack a different issue, than duplicate work.

I'm sure this is a new experiment, but I thought I'd kick off the discussion anyway.

-Scott

Apart from that, I totally understand you.

A good read in this context is http://hintjens.com/blog:106.

I'd say that everything should be ACKed by somebody else at least, even for trivial documentation changes, which allows for training / trying the process.

With some bigger things like jazzband/django-configurations#131, I wanted to wait for feedback from more contributors, and merged it when there were 3 thumbs up.

I think the procedure might be different for each repo, e.g. depending on the number of active contributors etc.

(This should be discussed at https://github.com/jazzband/roadies maybe? - although the "site" repo would be the place to discuss it. See also jazzband/help#2, which is related / relevant).

I think there need to be some guidelines for how this stuff 'should' happen, though each project is, of course, able to modify as it see's fit. I'm trying to be a good citizen, and also start the discussion.

I think there need to be some guidelines for how this stuff 'should' happen

👍

Ooops, I totally missed this issue folks, I had forgotten to watch the repo. In general those discussions should go into the roadies repo as it's more about policy than actual problems with the site.

I'll work on updating the FAQ next week to fix some of those questions that have come up, that we do already have plans but hadn't time yet to formulate precisely enough. Thanks for getting back to us though, this is super helpful.