dump sqlite
Closed this issue · 0 comments
Hi! I have been researching, and trying to objectively compare sqlite to the SLED db. Sled is awesome, zero config needed like sqlite and is more modern, secure, uses less memory than sqlite. After a half hour long conversation with chat gpt, Sled was given a 8.4 and sqlite3 was given a 6.5 out of 10. Just a general suggestion, but i suggest dumping sqlite3 entirely and using sled. Sled is more future proof, more secure, uses less resources and performs better. Sled is MADE in rust, made FOR rust. Ya can't go wrong!!! Anyways just thought i would share my data with you... i think sled would make your great board even more powerful!
Memory Usage: 8
Explanation: Sled DB has a low memory footprint, making it highly suitable for running many instances efficiently.
CPU Usage: 8
Explanation: Sled DB is optimized for key-value operations, resulting in lower CPU usage compared to SQL query processing.
Scalability: 8
Explanation: Sled DB scales well horizontally, allowing for efficient management of multiple instances.
Concurrency Handling: 9
Explanation: Sled DB excels at handling high concurrency with minimal contention, making it ideal for multi-instance setups.
Security: 9
Explanation: The lack of SQL queries eliminates the risk of SQL injection, and Rust's memory safety features enhance overall security.
Ease of Use: 8
Explanation: Sled DB is straightforward to use, especially for applications that don't require complex queries or relationships.
Data Integrity: 9
Explanation: Sled DB provides ACID transactions, ensuring reliable data integrity and consistency.
Development Complexity: 8
Explanation: The key-value model simplifies development, reducing the need to manage complex schemas and queries.
Performance Under Load: 9
Explanation: Sled DB performs well under heavy load, particularly with concurrent operations, due to its efficient design.
Maintenance and Monitoring: 8
Explanation: Sled DB is relatively easy to maintain, with modern tooling and monitoring capabilities.
Overall Rating for Sled DB: 8.4
///////////////////
SQLite3
Memory Usage: 6
Explanation: SQLite3 has a moderate memory footprint, but it can become significant when running many instances due to the overhead of maintaining multiple database connections and handling SQL queries.
CPU Usage: 6
Explanation: CPU usage can be higher due to the need to parse and execute SQL queries, especially under heavy load.
Scalability: 5
Explanation: SQLite3 scales well vertically but can struggle with horizontal scaling, especially when write concurrency increases.
Concurrency Handling: 5
Explanation: SQLite3 handles concurrent reads well but uses a single-writer lock, which can become a bottleneck in write-heavy scenarios.
Security: 6
Explanation: While SQLite3 can be secured against SQL injection with proper practices, it is inherently more vulnerable to such attacks compared to a key-value store.
Ease of Use: 8
Explanation: SQLite3 is easy to set up and use, with extensive documentation and community support.
Data Integrity: 9
Explanation: SQLite3 provides strong ACID compliance, ensuring reliable data integrity and transaction management.
Development Complexity: 7
Explanation: Using SQL and managing schemas adds some complexity, but it's manageable with good practices.
Performance Under Load: 6
Explanation: Performance can degrade under heavy concurrent writes due to the single-writer lock.
Maintenance and Monitoring: 7
Explanation: SQLite3 is relatively easy to maintain but requires careful monitoring to ensure performance and security.
Overall Rating for SQLite3: 6.5