Support lodash
Opened this issue · 6 comments
Any interest in supporting lodash?
Certainly! Thanks for reaching out, what do you have in mind?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 22, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Anthony Smith notifications@github.com wrote:
Any interest in supporting lodash?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Since lodash promotes itself as a drop-in replacement for underscore.js, I don't think there are much differences between them. Especially in this project, only the underscore namespace and some basic things like object chaining are used.
I have run the test with latest lodash and it passed all tests
Sounds great! Patches welcome, or if you can point me to a project that does this currently I can work on it when I get a chance. Thanks!
I wanted to make this work with both, but I was not really sure what was the best way to do it so I forked the project to work with lodash for now.
To have this library working for both lodash and underscore:
- The browser version should already work without any changes.
- For the Node version, a
try
/catch
would fail when bothunderscore
andlodash
are available,
so maybe allowing something likerequire('underscore.inflection/lodash')
could be nice. - I do not really know what are the best practices with AMD for this kind of cases.
@tuvistavie Thanks for your fork! I wanted to open an issue there to ask for the bower package - however, no issues can be opened in your fork. Is this on purpose? Are you planning to add the bower package?