Algorithm is too liberal in it's rating
Opened this issue · 0 comments
craSH commented
The algorithm gave the Foxconn page a 10, but I think it weighted the number of external references too high for this article, as the article itself isn't very long or of substantial quality. I rated it a 7 myself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foxconn
Also; perhaps a new issue label for the algorithm?