json-iterator/go

The behavior of json.Unmarshal when encountering field type inconsistencies.

Opened this issue · 3 comments

func TestJson(t *testing.T) {
    type info struct {
       Id int64 `json:"id"`
    }
    type test struct {
       Result []info `json:"result"`
    }
    r := `{"result":[{"id":"1"},{"id":"2"}]}`


    var res1 test
    var res2 test


    // use encoding/json
    json2.Unmarshal([]byte(r), &res1)

    // use json-iterator/go                 
    jsoniter.ConfigCompatibleWithStandardLibrary.Unmarshal([]byte(r), &res2)

    len1 := len(res1.Result)      // 2
    len2 := len(res2.Result)      // 1


    fmt.Println(len1, len2)
}

image

I want to know which handling behavior is more appropriate.

The appropriateness of the behavior depends on your specific use case and requirements:

Strict Type Checking (Standard encoding/json):

Pros: Ensures that the data conforms exactly to the expected types, which can prevent subtle bugs and data inconsistencies.
Cons: Requires the input data to be strictly formatted, which might not always be the case, especially when dealing with external APIs or user-generated content.
Lenient Type Conversion (json-iterator/go):

Pros: More flexible in handling input data, which can be useful when dealing with inconsistent or loosely typed JSON data.
Cons: May mask data issues and lead to unexpected behavior if the type conversion does not work as intended.

Both Unmarshal functions return Error. You should handle errors first. Otherwise results are unpredictable.

Thx guys