Respecting attribute order

[timnashcouk]

In the scenario:
fsql "select FULLPATH(name), hash from...
I would expect the return to be:
/path hash
instead it's hash /path

running the latest version available via brew.
% fsql -v fsql version 0.3.x, built off master

[kashav]

Thanks for the issue! I agree with you.

The order was originally chosen to match that of ls -l (i.e. [mode] [size] [time] [name]), but I think as we introduce new attributes, it'd be better to respect the requested order.