How to use a block device on host as a container's rootfs?
mgjrr opened this issue · 5 comments
I want to replace the 9pfs by a virtual block device(created by vfio-mdev), if there any way to achieve it?
And can you tell me how to straight forward some hypervisor commands(qemu) in docker cli?
For example, run
docker run ... --straight_forward "-foo bar"
will create a process
qemu-system-x86_64 ... -foo bar
I would appreciate getting any pointers on this. Thanks in advance.
@mgjrr how did you create the device? (we need more details) try mounting the device and passing it using docker -v
The Kata configuration file (configuration.toml
) allows certain hypervisor options ("knobs") to be modified. These "knobs" should be sufficient for 99.99% of use cases. But if you really want to specify arbitrary hypervisor options you could do the following (but it's not recommended):
- Create a shell script that modifies (by looking at
$@
) or sets the hypervisor options you need. - Make sure the script ends with something like:
exec qemu-system-x86_64 $new_args
. - Modify your
configuration.toml
so thathypervisor.qemu.path
specifies the path to you script rather than the real hypervisor binary.
However, that would obviously be very fragile since your script would be hypervisor version specific, Kata version specific and also Kata configuration specific.
Also, have you looked at Kata 2.x which doesn't use 9p?
@devimc I create the device by a trival vfio-mdev routine
Yes, by this command I can use the virtual device in container
docker run -ti --runtime kata-qemu --cap-add=ALL --rm -v /dev:/dev --device /dev/vfio/73 centos/tools bash
But this still use the host's memory as storage.
@kata-containers/redhat any thoughts?
This issue is being automatically closed as Kata Containers 1.x has now reached EOL (End of Life). This means it is no longer being maintained.
Important:
All users should switch to the latest Kata Containers 2.x release to ensure they are using a maintained release that contains the latest security fixes, performance improvements and new features.
This decision was discussed by the @kata-containers/architecture-committee and has been announced via the Kata Containers mailing list:
- http://lists.katacontainers.io/pipermail/kata-dev/2020-November/001601.html
- http://lists.katacontainers.io/pipermail/kata-dev/2021-April/001843.html
- http://lists.katacontainers.io/pipermail/kata-dev/2021-May/001896.html
If you believe this issue still applies to Kata Containers 2.x, please open an issue against the Kata Containers 2.x repository, pointing to this one, providing details to allow us to migrate it.