Sites for review
korikori opened this issue · 4 comments
Blue team
- https://dndd.space/ domain expired/deleted
- https://mousdown.netlify.app/ server error
- https://kaalatrie.github.io/ 404 There isn't a GitHub Pages site here.
- https://lopeztel.xyz/ timeout
Orange team
- http://topik.natenorthway.com/ no DNS record
- https://ethandewey.com/ 404 There isn't a GitHub Pages site here.
- https://0xv31an5a1i5.xyz no DNS record
- https://tjout.com timeout
- https://3000.chat/ no DNS record
- https://ironveil.cloud/ no DNS record
- https://freshnode.net/ PR_END_OF_FILE_ERROR / possible certificate error
Green team
- https://sexiarz.pl/ no DNS record, domain near expiration or in some RGP equivalent
- https://rmxgrp.dev/ 502 Bad Gateway
- https://julb.es/ "Site not found" by hosting provider
- https://lighthouse16.com/ registrar placeholder page
- https://goestathomas.de/ timeout/certificate issue
- https://c1.fi/v/512kb/about/en/ 404 - Page not found
- https://g.rmxgrp.dev/ This domain is for sale.
- https://www.nurminen.xyz/ You've successfully started the Nginx Proxy Manager.
- https://www.jamontheroad.com/ no DNS record
- https://bruton.tech/ timeout
Conversely, it feels like this check can be automated? The majority of the errors (except for placeholder pages) can be caught easily.
Misc
- https://vfast.co.uk/ is currently at 572KB uncompressed https://gtmetrix.com/reports/vfast.co.uk/DqETnCsd/
Thanks so much for taking the time to go through the list!
I removed most of them via #966, but kept the sites with invalid certs:
Since they are technically still up, I'm unsure whether we should remove them or not, but I'm open for discussion.
Also, I know that https://lopeztel.xyz/ should still be active. To be sure, I asked the owner in this thread.
Regarding automatic this: I'm sure there's a way to achieve this, but we didn't have the time to implement such a feature yet. I remember that @kmutahar did some effort to add size checking (see this directory). Maybe this could be expanded?
Closing this issue for now, but we can keep the conversation going.
Thanks again for your effort!
Not a problem at all, happy to help. I expect that adding such a check should be trivial, but I have no real Python experience - I'll look into @kmutahar's script to see if I can get my head around it.
Just a couple of clarifications on the list:
- The problem with https://lighthouse16.com/ is that it opens what appears to be a hosting provider/domain registrar placeholder page;
- My first entry for https://rmxgrp.dev/ should have been for https://kieran.rmxgrp.dev, which is still listed (but also affected).
I've prepared a very simple script that identified 19 of the 21 URLs originally for review, but also has a few false positives. I'll submit a pull request with more details and thoughts shortly.