some missing inflection candidates
Closed this issue · 3 comments
Why isn't -de being reported for
sa-ma-ra,sa-ma-ra-de
wo-ko-de,wo-ko
?
I think it's a side effect of switching from 'root' to 'sa-ma-ra-root' for dealing with the 0-value root ("walk" for "walked" and "walking" since we need a value for it, while the other two have inflection values of "ed" and "ing"). I did that originally to fix a different problem where it was over matching on 'root'. :-/
Ah, actually, it's because it has no intersections with anything, so rather than being a family, it's a stand-alone, which is what we should also see for the connective enclitic -qe.
Oh, hey, not a bug. Sweet. These are capture in "Inflection Candidates" as expected, just not in "Inflection Family Candidates". Fixing the recognition of the syllabary might make it smart enough to include -de in its toponym family, but there's where to deal with its exclusion, not here. Sweet.