Better structure for the "ruling section".
Closed this issue · 3 comments
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1AG6v7jzLVBMtNG0LcoIVKtxpjBuFHbfr
This could be a bit complicated to implement before the launch, but if we can't do it now, we could do it a bit later.
Does the Image Show a Doge?
The decision of the jury was NO. The PROSECUTOR won the case.
You voted for the SUBMITTER.
Juror 2 voted for the PROSECUTOR.
Juror 3 voted for the PROSECUTOR.
Your vote was INCOHERENT with the majority. As a result, you lost X PNK.
(Here we could add some link saying "How is this calculated?” This could link to a Medium post explaining that).
What is the point of showing Juror 1 voted X, Juror 2 voted X, etc, if they are anonymous? Isn't showing the total votes for each side better?
Either solution is good. I'm just thinking of a way for the juror to better understand how the coherent/incoherent thing works and how it affects PNK distribution.
We need to start working on the knowledge base for things like this that we need to link to. We already have https://crisp.chat/en/knowledge/