`etcd-manager` default control store path
Closed this issue · 5 comments
A question for legacy etcd-manager
:
Not the most exciting topic but I can't find a better place for this question (etcd-manager
has been archived in favor of this project)
I'm stuck on this old version(3.0.20190930
) of etcd-manager
and noticed the same behavior on the latest version of etcd-manager
too:
the control store is reusing the path for backup (reference). is this desired?
the data from the control store are being used for both controller
and backupcontroller
. for example, control store contains data to see if a cluster is new (reference)
with the current set up, if we specify a S3 bucket for backup, e.g. s3://foobar
, the object hierarchy will look like this:
...
s3://foobar/backup/etcd/main/control/
s3://foobar/backup/etcd/main/control/etcd-cluster-created
s3://foobar/backup/etcd/main/control/etcd-cluster-spec
s3://foobar/backup/etcd/main/2022-01-01T00:00:00Z-123456/
...
where to me what would make more sense would be:
...
s3://foobar/etcd/main/control/
s3://foobar/etcd/main/control/etcd-cluster-created
s3://foobar/backup/etcd/main/control/etcd-cluster-spec
s3://foobar/backup/etcd/main/2022-01-01T00:00:00Z-123456/
...
so that backup
dir will contain backup data only, preventing accidentally deleting the control files
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/stale
is applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stale
was applied,lifecycle/rotten
is applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale
- Mark this issue or PR as rotten with
/lifecycle rotten
- Close this issue or PR with
/close
- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/stale
is applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stale
was applied,lifecycle/rotten
is applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten
- Close this issue or PR with
/close
- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/stale
is applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stale
was applied,lifecycle/rotten
is applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Reopen this issue with
/reopen
- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten
- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".
In response to this:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/stale
is applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stale
was applied,lifecycle/rotten
is applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rotten
was applied, the issue is closedYou can:
- Reopen this issue with
/reopen
- Mark this issue as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten
- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close not-planned
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.