kubernetes-sigs/aws-encryption-provider

Looking for feedback on KMS v2 proposal

aramase opened this issue ยท 4 comments

Hello ๐Ÿ‘‹๐Ÿป

As part of Kubernetes 1.25 enhancement we (sig-auth kms wg) are proposing a new v2alpha1 KeyManagementService service contract to:

  • enable fully automated key rotation for the latest key
  • improve KMS plugin health check reliability
  • improve observability of envelop operations between kube-apiserver, KMS plugins and KMS

This is the doc that documents the limitations with the current KMS v1 API.

In addition, we are also proposing a SIG-Auth maintained KMS plugin reference implementation. This implementation will support a key hierarchy design that implements the v2alpha1 API and will serve as a baseline that provides:

  • improve readiness times for clusters with a large number of encrypted resources
  • reduce the likelihood of hitting the external KMS request rate limit
  • metrics and tracing support

We have a KEP open for this proposal that details the changes and design: kubernetes/enhancements#3302

Call to action

We are looking for feedback on the proposed changes in the KEP from all the plugin authors who are currently using the KMS v1 API. Please review the proposal and comment on the PR if there are any questions/concerns with the proposed design.

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue with /reopen
  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue with /reopen
  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.