kvark/copyless

More pemissive license?

Closed this issue · 5 comments

stanislav-tkach commented

I'm not sure if it is appropriate, but can you please replace the license by a more permissive one? For example, MIT or Apache 2.0. I would like to use this library, but the company that I'm currently working at has a policy that forbids MPL license.

kvark commented

I'm totally open to switch to MIT+Apache, we have that in other projects too. Let's ask the contributors for permission:

If we don't get an answer in a week from now, we'll consider rewriting the relevant parts.

  • 👍3
  • 🎉1
badboy commented

I merely fixed some typos.
But if required I hereby allow a a relicense to MIT/Apache

  • 👍2
eun-ice commented

I contributed just a few lines to fix a bug.

But I feel honored by being asked and of course I happily allow a relicense to MIT/Apache.

  • 👍2
danielhenrymantilla commented

Fine for me 👍

  • 👍1
kvark commented

Alright, we are all set. Thanks everyone for responding!
@DarkEld3r would you be interested in making a PR that switches us to dual-license?

  • 👍1