l7mp/stunner

[Question] Co-existence with Cilium?

Closed this issue · 3 comments

jackmaninov commented

Hello. In #8 it is mentioned that in 2022 STUNner could not interoperate with Cilium. I'm wondering has there has been any updates in that regard?

I am evaluating whether I can deploy STUNner alongside a cluster using Cilium as CNI. Thank you.

levaitamas commented

Hi @jackmaninov,

There should be no issue with using STUNner with Cilium. I guess we run on Cilium in Google Cloud.
In #8, we discussed our upcoming eBPF offload that might interfere with Cilium.

I hope this answers your question. I am closing this for now, but feel free to reopen if you encounter any issues related to Cilium+STUNner or open new ones if you have any other questions or issues. I also invite you to our Discord server. Last but not least, if you need any extra services, we are in the consultancy business as l7mp.io.

  • 👍2
jackmaninov commented

One small conflict I would note is that the stunner-gateway-operator helm chart installs v1.0.0 of the gateway-api CRDs, but recent versions of cilium require v1.1.0+.

Other projects I've seen that use gateway-api tend to not bundle the CRDs, and they're iterating so rapidly anyways. It would be worth making this installation optional in your chart.

levaitamas commented

Hi @jackmaninov,
You can use your own gateway-api CRD with STUNner. See the docs: https://docs.l7mp.io/en/stable/INSTALL/#skip-install-crds

  • 👍1