Unexpected behaviour copying a REVERSING transaction
Closed this issue · 1 comments
ehuelsmann commented
Version
1.11.12
What browsers are you seeing the problem on?
This problem isn't browser related
What happened?
When copying a REVERSING transaction, the copied transaction indicates it will reverse the same transaction as the transaction that was copied from. However, a transaction can't be reversed twice, so this is clearly incorrect behaviour.
What should have happened?
We need to determine that either
- Copying a REVERSING transaction doesn't make sense
- Copying a REVERSING transaction makes it a normal transaction
ehuelsmann commented
Ok. I decided that copying a reversing transaction simply shouldn't be allowed. That's the quickest and most predictable outcome (for AR and AP transactions/invoices).