define "valid" explicitly
jmhodges opened this issue · 1 comments
jmhodges commented
Per discussion in letsencrypt/boulder#464, "valid" needs an explicit definition. There is also some discussion there about defining "valid" as not-404ing leading to possible information leaks now or in the future as the spec is expanded.
cpu commented
This repository is deprecated & un-maintained. Closing this issue. If applicable, please move discussion to the replacement IETF owned repo and the mailing list.