Scientific Notation Textual Highlighting

Question

Scientific Notation Textual Highlighting

Closed this issue 8 years ago · 9 comments

When using scientific notation to define a number the text highlighting is not consistent throughout the number. This could be a limitation forced down by Xtext.

Answer 1 · 2017-01-26T17:30:54.000Z

I've investigated this but I don't have the first clue on how to fix it and I'm not sure it's worth the budget at the moment.

Answer 2 · 2017-05-04T19:58:19.000Z

Aaron,

Do you mind this format? Keep in mind that the way I've implemented this will require you to explicitly using the +/- sign on the exponent.

You can say 10.0E-1, 10.0e-1, 10.0e+1, or 10.0E+1 but not 10.0E1

Answer 3 · 2017-05-04T20:33:01.000Z

@manthonyaiello

Answer 4 · 2017-05-04T20:39:33.000Z

Seems fine to me.

…

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Lucas Wagner ***@***.***> wrote: @manthonyaiello <https://github.com/manthonyaiello> — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#60 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGeTjEG-Xd0R4LusKMaNzy_sh78q4Dofks5r2jX9gaJpZM4LiC9M> .

Answer 5 · 2017-05-04T20:46:38.000Z

Tony pointed out something: now 'e' is a keyword in the language. Not good. I'll have to figure something else out.

Answer 6 · 2017-05-04T22:22:09.000Z

Oh good point ... I didn't think of that initially.

…

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Lucas Wagner ***@***.***> wrote: Tony pointed out something: now 'e' is a keyword in the language. Not good. I'll have to figure something else out. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#60 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGeTjA_jfETewaaY0Ou6WFya7iUcmubqks5r2jkugaJpZM4LiC9M> .

Answer 7 · 2017-05-05T15:01:59.000Z

How does this look?

Answer 8 · 2017-05-05T15:02:40.000Z

Looks perfect, to me. Tony

…

On May 5, 2017, at 11:01 , Andrew Gacek ***@***.***> wrote: How does this look? <https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/172168/25751217/d8c3edfa-3179-11e7-8424-0b7eac696ed1.png> — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#60 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAxMyd2VOZDtFyEaPcbyxlNWaFLXMb_Hks5r2znngaJpZM4LiC9M>.

Answer 9 · 2017-05-05T16:59:08.000Z

I'm happy with that. On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:02 AM, manthonyaiello <notifications@github.com> wrote:

…

Looks perfect, to me. Tony > On May 5, 2017, at 11:01 , Andrew Gacek ***@***.***> wrote: > > How does this look? > > <https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/ 172168/25751217/d8c3edfa-3179-11e7-8424-0b7eac696ed1.png> > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < #60 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ AAxMyd2VOZDtFyEaPcbyxlNWaFLXMb_Hks5r2znngaJpZM4LiC9M>. > — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#60 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGeTjOu_-o6J-rRSDK00H9ngCALytkP2ks5r2zoSgaJpZM4LiC9M> .