likecoin/likecoin-chain

Discussion: drop of develop branch

Closed this issue · 6 comments

rickmak commented

Currently, I am very confuse on the master vs develop branch. It looks no specific development workflow.

If no objection, I will delete the develop branch and all change target for the next release should send PR to master.

For feature development, let keep current convention of prefix with feat which is clear.

For patch we need to release to existing chain, we should patch the current master too. So of the nature of the blockchain, we will only keep one production branch, which is codename, like current sheungwan, fotan.

@williamchong @nnkken thought?

rickmak commented

Current default is master branch now. Will delete the develop branch.

williamchong commented

yes, for the codename branch should we use sementic prefix like v1.x.x-fotan for easier searching?

rickmak commented

I think we can start with v1.2.0-fotan. Just keep the old branch as it.

And in next non-binary compatible release, i.e. the Prefix change and cosmos sdk v0.44 upgrade. v2.x.x-{codename}

rickmak commented

I think major version tracking branch should be v1-fotan, v2-laichikok, v3-shatin, v4-taipo, etc?

williamchong commented

Yes that make sense

ckxpress commented

@nnkken and teammates had some previous discussions on the major version names.
p.s. i don't have any opinions on this.