Idea for a fast, CLV-based network pseudolikelihood
Opened this issue · 5 comments
lutteropp commented
lutteropp commented
I can implement that thing in an hour. It is super straight-forward.
lutteropp commented
I implemented it (took about 1.5 hours to code). Turns out it works pretty well! :-)
lutteropp commented
Here I printed the pseudologlikelihood and pseudo-BIC after each accepted move, to show how well this estimation performs:
example-run.txt
Cool thing is that computing this pseudologlikelihood doesn't take much more than computing the loglikelihood of a single phylogenetic tree.
lutteropp commented
My idea is to use pseudologlikelihood during initial prefiltering phase, and then move the top 10% of prefiltered candidates to the normal candidate ranking which uses real loglikelihood for scoring (the scoring involves brlenopt).
stamatak commented
that sounds like a reasonable approach
…On 30.04.21 14:29, Sarah Lutteropp wrote:
My idea is to use pseudologlikelihood during initial prefiltering phase,
and then move the top 10% of prefiltered candidates to the normal
candidate ranking which uses real loglikelihood for scoring (the scoring
involves brlenopt).
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#60 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGXB6XGFDCZ34MQVB5ZHYLTLKIAPANCNFSM432RQ5ZA>.
--
Alexandros (Alexis) Stamatakis
Research Group Leader, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies
Full Professor, Dept. of Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
www.exelixis-lab.org